Object Storage

For years, backups were tied to traditional file systems—rigid hierarchies of folders and filenames. As data grew and became more distributed, that structure began to buckle under the pressure of scale, complexity, and new privacy requirements. The solution that emerged from the cloud era was object storage—a fundamentally different way of storing and retrieving data that’s now transforming how we think about backups, long-term archiving, and digital sovereignty.

Prefer listening? Hit play below to hear this post come to life!

Powered by RedCircle

What Is Object Storage?

Unlike a file system, where data lives in directories, object storage treats every piece of data as a standalone object. Each object includes:

1. The data itself (the file’s content).
2. Metadata, which describes the object (file name, timestamps, encryption, owner, tags, or even custom privacy labels).
3. A unique identifier, like a hash or UUID, instead of a traditional file path.

These objects live in a flat namespace—no folders, no drives, just a vast addressable pool of data. When you upload or retrieve something, you don’t navigate through directories; you use an API call.

This architecture makes object storage scalable by design. It can span thousands of servers, across regions, or even continents, while presenting itself as a single logical system.

Why It Matters for Backups

Backups increasingly depend on the ability to handle huge amounts of data efficiently, maintain integrity, and restore quickly. Object storage directly addresses these needs.

1. Scalability Without Complexity

Because object storage scales horizontally, you don’t have to redesign your backup infrastructure when your data doubles—or when you add new nodes. Systems like Amazon S3, MinIO, or Wasabi can handle petabytes of data simply by adding more storage nodes.

2. Built-In Redundancy and Durability

Most object storage systems automatically replicate or erasure-code data across multiple drives or sites. That means a disk, node, or even an entire data center can fail without losing data. Traditional backups often rely on manual redundancy, but object storage makes it automatic.

3. API-Driven Automation

Object storage isn’t tied to a specific file system interface—it’s accessed via an API. That makes it ideal for automation tools, from simple cron jobs to modern orchestrators like n8n, Borg, or Restic. You can version, replicate, or encrypt backups programmatically without worrying about underlying storage details.

4. Privacy and Encryption Options

Many object storage platforms support client-side encryption, immutable storage, and encryption-at-rest. With proper configuration, you can ensure that no third party can read your data—even if they manage the infrastructure. For privacy advocates, this brings the promise of trustless backup: your data remains yours, wherever it’s stored.

5. Cost and Efficiency

Because object storage separates data management from physical hardware, it often costs less than block or file storage at scale. You only pay for what you use, and you can tier data—keeping recent backups on fast storage while pushing older archives to cheaper, slower layers without changing your workflow.

The Privacy and Security Angle

From a digital rights standpoint, object storage offers a unique mix of control and transparency. You can self-host an object storage system like MinIO or Ceph and maintain full data sovereignty, or use a cloud provider that supports end-to-end encryption and immutability.

The concept of immutable buckets—data that can’t be altered or deleted for a set period—is particularly relevant to privacy and compliance. It protects backups from ransomware, insider tampering, and accidental deletion, while also satisfying retention requirements under laws like GDPR.

However, it’s important to remember that object storage is not inherently private. The level of privacy depends on encryption policies, access controls, and where the data physically resides. Storing sensitive information on third-party clouds without encryption can undermine the very privacy object storage was meant to strengthen.

Real-World Examples

• Self-Hosting for Resilience: Small organizations and journalists use open-source tools like MinIO to create encrypted object stores that sync across multiple regions.
• Hybrid Cloud Strategies: Enterprises replicate data from on-prem systems to S3-compatible storage for redundancy and compliance.
• Immutable Backups: Cybersecurity teams now use “write-once-read-many” (WORM) object storage to maintain tamper-proof ransomware backups.

These models share a common thread: decentralized, resilient data protection that doesn’t rely on a single storage device or provider.

Looking Ahead

Object storage is becoming the new backbone of modern backups. As data grows more distributed and privacy concerns intensify, the ability to store, encrypt, and replicate backups independently of traditional file systems represents a quiet revolution in digital resilience.

For privacy-conscious users, it’s a tool that aligns with core principles: control, transparency, and recoverability. For organizations, it’s a pathway to scale without compromise.

The backup of the future won’t just be about keeping a copy of your data—it’ll be about keeping that copy under your control.

*This article was written or edited with the assistance of AI tools and reviewed by a human editor before publication.